“A tidy codebase is like a well-organized toolbox—find what you need in seconds, not minutes!” 🔧✨
Keeping your Spring Boot project’s packages clean and intuitive pays dividends as your app grows. Here’s a monkey-proof guide:
📂 1. Layer-Based vs. Feature-Based Structure
Layer-Based (Classic)
arduinoCopyEditcom.example.demo
├── controller
├── service
├── repository
├── model
└── config
- Pros: Everybody knows where to look.
- Cons: Can become unwieldy in large apps—too many classes in each layer.
Feature-Based (Modular)
pgsqlCopyEditcom.example.demo
├── user
│ ├── UserController.java
│ ├── UserService.java
│ ├── UserRepository.java
│ └── User.java
├── order
│ ├── OrderController.java
│ ├── OrderService.java
│ └── OrderRepository.java
└── common
├── config
└── util
- Pros: Group everything by feature; high cohesion.
- Cons: New team members need to learn feature names.
🔍 2. Sample Package Declarations
javaCopyEdit// Layer-based example
package com.example.demo.controller;
@RestController
public class ProductController { … }
// Feature-based example
package com.example.demo.order;
@RestController
public class OrderController { … }
🛠️ 3. Core Packages to Include
config
Classes for security, Swagger, CORS, data sources.controller
or feature/…
Your REST endpoints.service
Business logic—keep it stateless and testable.repository
Spring Data interfaces for DB access.model
or entity
JPA entities or DTO classes.util
or common
Shared helpers, constants, exceptions.
💡 4. Bonus Tips
- Keep package names short and meaningful.
- Avoid deep nesting, no more than 3 levels.
- Use
@ComponentScan
basePackages if you move your main class: javaCopyEdit@SpringBootApplication(scanBasePackages = "com.example.demo") public class DemoApplication { … }
- Re-evaluate structure periodically as new features land.